I read a blog titled “Election 2012” today and all though
there were plenty of statements made; there wasn’t a lot of numbers or hard
evidence to back up those statements. A
reader wants irrefutable evidence and statistics to be able to come to the same
conclusion as the author or, in other words, to be convinced by the author to
see the issue as they do. Also, the embedded
link is confusing because it does not lead to an individual article that the editorial
refers to, but to the home page of the website.
This makes it very difficult to research the information being
discussed. I don't know about you but I like to research everything before I form my opinion.
The message or purpose of the
editorial is also very unclear. Is the editorial about the lack of early voting
or is it about the fact that early voting was crowded because of everything that
was on the ballad or is it about both? The author should
attempt to offer up a clear solution to a clear problem and I did not feel as
if that was accomplished. The author
chose a very interesting topic that should be discussed, but as a reader, I was
left with many unanswered questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment